Manulife REIT is one of my few losing stocks. I bought before covid and its been a laggard in the recovery. There's a lot of bad news coming out of California and New York. Are they in a long term decline, or just a blip from covid?
What We Know
Manulife REIT's exposure to California/NY
2/3rds of Manulife REIT's assets by AUM are in California or New Jersey (NJ could be considered part of NY city):
Source: Manulife REIT Corporate Presentation Sep 2020
Are California/NY in Decline?
The news out of New York and California is bad. Companies leaving: HP, Oracle, Schwab. People leaving: Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, Kayne West. Crime, homelessness and tent cities in the city centers.
The news is emotional and politically slanted, so I need numbers.
U-Haul (a self-moving company), ranks states by net migration. Their Jan 2021 report has New York and NY and California ranked 48 and 50 out of 50. They were 44 and 49 in 2019.
The 2020 US Census estimate says:
- New Jersey's and New York's populations have dropped for the last 2 and 5 years respectively.
- California's dropped in 2020. For the first time in ten years. Even when it was growing before, it has been growing lower than the national rate since 2016.
So the numbers say that NY/NJ have been dropping for a while. California has been growing more slowly that the rest of the country from 2016 to 2019, and had its first drop last year.
One counterpoint: Tech firms moving in to rent out NY offices.
Operating leverage
- Property operating expenses (mostly fixed, p155): 37%
- Other Trust Expenses (audits, paperwork): 1-2%
- Finance Expenses: 14-15%
Financial leverage
What I Don't Know
Is California's 2020 population drop the start of a trend, or just a covid-19 blip?
Long term, how will WFM affect office space usage?
What I Think
- Good properties and tenants. Grade A or trophy offices, with a high number of 'blue chip' or government tenants. They have held out through the covid crisis well.
- Good management. Management is incentivised to increase DPU, not make acquisitions or increase AUM. They had a plan to grow by acquisition to be included in NAREIT, and they succeeded.
- A 100% payout ratio means they will have to raise capital again if they want to expand. If property values drop by 20%, they will have to raise capital anyway. Bad when they are paying an 8% dividend.
- NY and California are declining. NY/NJ is losing population. California has declined relative to US as a whole since 2015, and may starting to decline in absolute terms. So if you own property there, you are swimming against the tide.
Where Could I be Wrong?
- If things recover after covid, rents and valuations rise, the dividend yield goes down to 6%, the stock may rises 20% and they can raise capital to carry on expanding. The happy recovery scenario.
- If California and New York are in a long decline, rents slowly decrease after 3-5 year lease expiries, the dividend and stock price slowly drops, so do building valuations, and they have to raise money by issuing very expensive stock. The bleed-to-death scenario.
2 comments:
Don't agree on the 8% yield part being priced in, US-based SGX REITs trade at a huge discount compared to actual US REITs (BXP - 5%, CXP - 5.9%)
Yeah, the discount is probably due to SGX listing. Maybe also because they distribute 100% of their distributable income.
Post a Comment