Bought Mongolia Mining Corporation (HK:0975)

Bought 227000 shares on Wed 28th July, at HKD 0.169.  Total cost around USD 4875.

This is from the Capitalist Exploits blog in Sept.  The story is about the resurrection of a Mongolian coal mine, which together with a proposed railroad to China, can provide coking coal cheaper than Australian producers.  The risks are political and in execution.  This is a 1% position and the stock may go to zero.  A crash in HK small caps last week gave an opportunity to buy.

Potash

Potash has been dropping for four years now.  Is this a normal commodity cycle, where prices stay low enough that new investment is discouraged and marginal players are squeezed out?  If so, where are we now?

Introduction

Potash is a fertiliser which provides crops with potassium - one of the three primary nutrients for plants.  It accounts for 70 to 90% of potassium fertiliser used, and is commonly used for bulk crops or grains (1).  There is no commercially feasible substitute, although some are working on it (1, 2).

Potash is plentiful, but the industry has long since been an oligopoly, due to the enormous capital requirements in setting up the mines and transport.  In 2013 the potash oligopoly broke up, with one of the players flooding the market.  Prices have headed down since:

(Source: SeekingAlpha article: Potash - a 2018 story?)

Demand

Annual demand is around 55-65 million tons.

In the long term demand is constant.  A known amount of Potassium is depleted in the soil for each crop and must be replenished.  But usage varies year by year, as replenishment can be delayed a few years due to crop rotations, rainfall, crop prices, etc:

(Source: Uralkali 2015 investor presentation)

Long term demand is has grown by 2% since 1994:

(Source: 2016 Agrium Inevstor day presentation)

Ignore short term demand since its unpredictable.  Just assume long term demand growth of 2%, and concentrate on looking at supply instead.

Supply

The latest cost curve I have, showing actual production estimates, is from 2015:

(Source: Morgan Stanley: March 2016 Report: Global Chemicals: Potash S&D Update)

Transport Costs

The above excludes transport costs, which are significant for a bulk commodity like Potash.

From Canada:

• Estimated CAD 45 per ton from Saskatchewan to Vancouver on the Pacific coast. Around 2000km by rail.
• Or an estimated USD 50 to 100 per ton to transport from Saskatchewan to the US.

From Russia:

• 80% of Uralkali's exports are shipped through St. Petersburg.  Total transport cost (rail and freight) for this was USD 28 per tonne in 2015 (p29).  Most of the remaining potash was transported to China by rail, which cost USD 39 per ton.

From Belarus:

• Belaruskali gives no transport costs, but they must be lower since Belarus is so much closer to the sea that Uralkali's Perm region mines.

Future Supply

Supply is quite easy to predict.  Since potash mines are massive projects that take 5-7 years and $1-2 bn to complete, most companies' expansion plans are well known.   Most projects go belly up, especially those from small companies.

For production that is likely to be built, net depletions:

• I get 11 mt/pa to be added by 2021.  8.5mt if you exclude Yancoal, for which the project has not started development yet.
• That is assuming mines operate at 90% of capacity. 
• Also excluding any additional capacity from Potash Corp (POT).  Assume they won't increase production even if they have capacity, as they continue to act as the swing producer in a low priced environment.
• Also assumes Jansen dies.

Conclusion

Even taking the lowest figure of 8.5 mt net extra capacity by 2020, with the conservative assumptions above - with long term growth of 2%, it will take 5.5 years (from now) to absorb the extra supply.  That seems balanced.  We are not at a place where we can say that Potash prices will rise due to constrained supply in the future.  We're at a place where we can say they may stop going down.

Another thing to watch for are potential African projects.  Ethiopia (Dankalli) seems dead, with ICL pulling out due to lack of infrastructure.  But Republic of Congo and Gabon look interesting - very low production costs, no rail required, and easy shipping to Brazil.  Still too early to tell if they produce, but if they do hit their numbers, they'll be the cheapest producers in the world.

Appendix - List of future Potash projects

I judge the likelihood of new capacity plans to be actually built based on the track record of the company, their financial backing, and the cash costs of the project.

New production capacity that is likely to be built is below, listed from lowest-cost to highest-cost (left side of cost curve first):

Company	Project(s)/Description	Net production addition	Cash Costs/mt
Uralkali	Increase from 10.8mt KCl (production) in 2016 to 14.4mt (nameplate capacity) in 2020  That includes a 2mt loss from existing mine depletion, and 2 new Mines (Solikamsk No 2 for 2.3mt/pa and Ust-Yayvinsky for 2.5mt/pa).  (Source: E&MJ, 2015 article)	2.2mt by 2020, assuming operating at 90%capacity.	Same as existing Uralkali operations
Acron	2mt.  Production scheduled to start from 2021 to 2023. Mine under design in 2015.  This company seems very profitable, but this is their first potash mine.	2 mt capacity. 1.8 mt if operating at 90% capacity.	Same as Uralkali - in Prem region.
EuroChem	Usolskiy mine expected startup in 4Q 2017. Volgakaliy expected mid 2018 startup. Both projects have 8.3mt KCl production potential.	4.2 mt nameplate capacity around 2020.  So 3.8mt if operating at 90% capacity. 8.3mt nameplate capacity afterward?	Same as Uralkali
Belaruskali	Est 10.3mt production in 2015, plans to increase supply to 12.5mt by start of 2020. That includes Petrikovskoye, which will add 1.5mt KCl. Little information available about this company.	1 mt if operating at 90% capacity.	Same as existing Belaruskali operations
Agrium	Produced 2.2m in 2016, which is 73% of nameplate capacity of 3mt (p8).  Expect to ramp up in 2017 .	0.5 mt, if operating at 90% capacity.	Same as existing Agrium   operations
K+S	Legacy: started producing in May 2017, expect to reach 2m production by end 2017.  Plan to sell 0.7mt to US, the remainder offshore. Started production May 2017 K+S estimated to currently produce 6mt in Germany.  High cost operations.	2mt by end 2017 2.9 mt by end 2019	Slightly lower than Potash Corp
Potash Corp (POT)	9.3mt production in 2016.  They closed high cost mine (New Brunswick) but opened a cheaper one (Rocanville). Total planned expansion is 10.1mt.    Morgan Stanley estimates 2015 had 9.3mt operating capacity, with 5.5mt capable of restarting in 12 months.  They model 13.4mt capacity increase by 2020. Not all their capacity is used; POT acts as the swing producer.	Additional 10mt capacity, but may not be used if process remain low.
YanCoal	Production capacity 2.8m. Part of Yanzhou Coal (HK:1171), which has been profitable for the last 5 years (p10) , but with high debt (40X 2016 income, p11).  Are Chinese companies operating from a strategic rather than economic perspective?  ie: acquire resources, don't expect profits. Economics should be the same as any Ssachkatchewan project.  May have environmental impact.	2.5 mt if operating at 90% capacity.	Similar to POT

Production the is likely to be removed is listed below:

Company	Project(s)/Description	Net production removal	Cash Costs/mt
ICL	Cease UK production of 1mt/pa in 2018, produce SOP instead.	-1mt
Intreprid	High-cost US miner.  May go out of business.  I’ll be conservative, and assume they do.	-1mt
K+S	Sigmundshall mine depleted by 2020.  Estimate its production is 0.3mt (p25, p8)	-0.3mt
Vale	0.5mt.  Depleted by 2018	-0.5 mt

Speculative projects, as of now, unlikely to be built:

Company	Project(s)/Description	Nameplate Capacity	Cash Costs/mt
Uralkali	Additional 2.8mt from panned Polovodovo mine. Costs 1.6bn, they may not have the money.	2.8 mt by 2023	Same as existing Uralkali operations
BHP	Jansen.  8mt pa production, (10m nameplate capacity).  BHP committed 3.8bn, estimates total cost is 14bn. I don’t think it will ever produce.	10 mt	Need potash price of over USD 400 to be profitable, says POT.
Sirius Minerlas	York project, under a national Park.  Nameplate capacity 20mt/pa.  Currently under design and site preparation. Produces polyhite, not KCl. May be a different product.  Polyhite is probably more useful for producing SOP  It has 4 plant nutrients, so may be better sold as as blended fertilizer that has no Cl.  Has less potassium than SOP. LSE listed.  Stock price up to ~1.4bn pounds market cap.  Gina Rinehart has a stake.	Probably not relevant, supplying a different market.
Encato Potash	2.8mt capacity in Saskatchewan. They bought native rights.  Encato has a market cap of ~50m.	2.8 mt	Similar to POT
Circum Minerals	New Dankalli mine (Ethopia) schedued to produce 2mnt by 2021 ICL quit the project in Oct 2016.	2 mt	USD 38/t operating costs.  But 500km rail/truck to Dijoubit.
ENAMCO/ Dankalli	Dankalli/Colluli (Eritrea)	Produce SOP not MOP, not relevant here.
Elemental Minerals (Kore Potash)	Kola project. DFS to end in 2018.  Expected start of production 2022.   DFS to focus on 2mt. Dongou project Yangala (Dougou extesion) ASX listed, small company	Plan for 5.5mt production from all mines	Very Cheap: Life-of-Mine cost $68/ton.  Cheap transport: Only 36km from coast – use conveyor belt
Plymoth	In Gabon (near KorePotash, north of Republic or Cngo) 2 projects, no estimate for production capacity. ASX listed, small company
African Potash	Lac Dinga: In Republic of Congo.  No estimate provided for production capacity. Small AIM listed company.
Highfield Resources	1.6mt production for 2 Spanish projects. Plus 1m for another project. ASX listed, small company	3.6 mt

Sold Pacific Basin Shipping

Sold Pacific Basin Shipping (HK:2343) at HKD 1.60 on 8th June, for loss of SGD 1703.

I've changed my mind.  Not confident on this one, as new ships can be built in 18-24 months, limiting any sustained rise in prices.  We can't just look at a 10-year chart and say the BDI is gonna go back to 2008 levels. I think the time to buy shipping stocks is when even the best players have been losing money for 1 or 2 quarters - when things are so bad they can only get better.  At that point, you may get 50% upside.  It would be a small trade - trying to catch a falling knife - and I would be dribbling in slowly... maybe 1% after one bad quarter and another 1% after a second.

If I want to play at all.  Shipping is a tough sector.  There's no way to value a shipping company - earnings and vessel values are cyclical.